骨灰玩家
是浪子，別泊岸
 
- 贡献度
- 738
- 金元
- 200606
- 积分
- 23023
- 精华
- 1
- 注册时间
- 2009-6-7
   
|
没有中文，评论就不翻了
This game is honestly very good in my opinion and just to be clear it is currently singleplayer. For $9 it has excellent content. It is safe to say the game accomplishes what it set out to do and the price is very affordable and worth it. I would argue that with some patches and updates it is easily worth more than the asking price. I would recommend this for any player like myself that wants to play multiplayer but with bots instead of actual players. Think Call Of Duty with bots but medieval and larger scale. It has very good controller support which is great for players that do not like keyboard and mouse. Currently the game has a few bugs but every game that releases starts that way. I suggest being patient, reporting any issues, and be objective. This game literally released with far less issues than a lot of higher budget games which is very impressive because some of those 100 million budget and higher games spent years making and testing. This is a $9 game and does not have the budget of Battlefield or something like Call Of Duty. I played about an hour offline to test if an internet connection is needed and I can confirm it is not needed. This is truly an offline battlefield style game. I consider it similar to Lord Of The Rings Conquest and Battlefield. There are currently three classes, working movesets, and the combat is pretty realistic when compared to other games in similar price range. One example is as an archer I can't shoot through friendly units while many higher budget games like Dynasty Warriors allow that. For classes you have a sword and shield unit, a two handed sword unit, and an archer. I love playing as an archer because the actual arrow has realistic drop mechanics. Games like Call Of Duty do not have bullet drops regardless of how far you are while in this game the arrow does drop depending on the distance. I played as an archer for a few games and I believe the accuracy is an accurate depiction of real archery. There is not a zoom option while using the bow and arrow but real archers didn't have that either.
There are many other positives to this game. Some others is the scale of the battles and you can choose where you spawn when you capture some locations. The battles are massive and the maps are fairly large. The spawning choices when locations are captured makes it very good for trying to stop advancing enemies. I don't want to spawn at the back of the map when I have several captured locations which thankfully this game doesn't do to you. You can have more than 200 bots but since I use a gaming laptop I only went with 150 or whatever the difficulty mode above normal is. The gameplay is just like described, you capture locations. This is similar to Domination in Call Of Duty. Team deathmatch and maybe something similar to capture the flag could work for this game. For capture the flag maybe capture the crown since it is medieval themed?
The graphics I would say are very good for the asking price. I have tried three out of the four maps and found all of them very enjoyable. My biggest issues with the game is that you don't have a viewable map while alive (that I know of), units can not be commanded, team size can not be set without increasing the difficulty, and the AI sometimes stands around idle unless attacked or given around 15 or so seconds but that only happens to a few units. If you have 50 units only about 4 or less usually are inactive but the developer said they will upgrade the AI. I believe the difficulty increases based on the amount of the bots and not the difficulty of the AI itself but that is from an hour of playing.
Performance is not something I can really comment on because I have a gaming laptop that has bad cooling. I was able to play with over 100 bots and only experienced a slight lag when all units spawned. This is probably due to my PC because it does not perform as well as a gaming desktop and have proper cooling. I would suggest the developers allow unit squads or maybe a system that allows you to order units. This could make the game a lot better with team based battles because then you can order archers to stay on the walls and launch arrows at the enemy while your soldiers fight the enemies. That is just one example. I completely understand if they do not choose to because Battlefield and Lord Of The Rings Conquest did not allow commanding units. I love this game and I am very thankful for it. Very few games exist that are similar to Battlefield and Lord Of The Rings Conquest. It also reminds me of Ravenfield but that game involves guns. I like having a massive team based game with a medieval theme. The developers said they will continue to support the game so I will continue to follow and play this game. They made a post that says their roadmap and I am excited. I would like to see more classes, maybe a few new modes, and more maps but with the current content it is very enjoyable for me. Probably some features that could enhance the game is a minimap for navigation, gender options (not a big thing considering in medieval times it was mostly men fighting in these wars), and possibly the ability to heal yourself? Realistically speaking you couldn't just eat an item and heal yourself back in the medieval times so if they don't implement a healing system then that is not a bad thing since it is just like in real life. I also would like to see splitscreen to play with my friends and family but as a solo player that prefers bots over real players it is still great. Thank you for your time and patience with my review. |
|
发表于 2022-1-11 03:19
收藏
![滑稽[永久版]](static/image/common/medal266.gif)
